Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
- Jul 28, 202659LiveOverall +1 · Information hierarchy +8 · Trust −4Viewing
- Jul 5, 202658First tracked report — strongest Mobile web 70, weakest Trust 34View →
Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How OneWill ranks
- 1.
E2B80
- 2.
Composio78
- 3.
Arcade75
- 4.
HumanLayer66
- 5.
OneWill59
59Growth scoreupdated
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Lazyweb TeamAI Growth PMTurn this score into growth.Analyze your site and propose fixes across conversion, SEO, and AEOMonitor competitors’ in-product UX and A/B testsLearn from growth experiments across 10,000+ top productsStart Team trial →Score over time
Trust
30PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| OneWill | No visible trust signal identified. |
| "ARCADE IS TRUSTED FOR PRODUCTION AGENTS AT" logo strip with Relevance AI, YUR, Sybill, eddo learning | |
| Customer logo strip: HubSpot, wabi, agent.ai, Zoom | |
| "TRUSTED BY ENGINEERS AT" logo strip (Upstart, Casco, Osmosis, Ambral, Nautilus, Squads, Weave, Risotto, Roadrunner) | |
| implicit context E2B may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience. |
Value props
55FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
OneWill’s headline vague
Chances are, your agents are either locked up or running wild.
It doesn't have to be this way. OneWill offers you a middle ground.
Working
- Vivid, felt problem framing for agent builders
- Illustrations demonstrate the tradeoff, not decorate
- Tradeoff labels (safety vs. risk) are concrete
Could improve
- "Middle ground" never defined — no mechanism
- Zero numbers or proof points in the fold
- No outcome stated for choosing OneWill
CTA
62FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?
Problems
- sales call feels costly
- small vs headline on desktop
- demo buried as secondary
- no value promise in label
Mobile web
74FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
123- Sandbox cage illustration — The image eats most of the first viewport, pushing the comparison payoff and mid-page CTA deep below the fold.
- Dual header buttons — DEMO and TALK TO US compete side by side; neither is full-width, splitting the tap decision at the top of the page.
- Floating or divider — The orange 'or' circle overlaps the Sandbox card edge and reads as a stray button rather than a divider.
Information hierarchy
76FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
123- Orange 'or' circle — Uses the exact CTA orange at triple the button's size, so it outdraws the TALK TO US action it sits above.
- Header DEMO button — Styled at near-equal weight to the adjacent TALK TO US, splitting the fold's action into two competing paths.
- Bottom TALK TO US — The page's resolution CTA is smaller than either illustration card, easy to skim past after the visual comparison.